This quote implies that victory in war cannot be guaranteed solely based on intention or desire. It suggests that success in warfare must be earned through strategic planning, competent leadership, and the necessary capabilities to overcome challenges and prevail in battle.
The quote emphasizes the seriousness and significance of politics, indicating that it should be approached with a sense of gravity and responsibility rather than treated as a mere game or trivial pursuit.
This quote draws a parallel between politics and war, suggesting that the strategies and tactics employed in both can share similarities. It humorously suggests that, like in war, extreme or ruthless measures may be considered necessary in the realm of politics.
This quote highlights the common understanding that historical accounts are often shaped and presented from the perspective of those who have achieved victory or dominance in a given conflict or historical event. It implies a recognition of the potential biases and limitations of historical narratives.
This quote humorously implies that the challenges of democracy become evident when engaging in discussions with uninformed or uninvolved voters. It reflects on the complexities of democratic decision-making and the importance of an informed electorate.
This quote characterizes war as a collection or record of significant mistakes or errors. It implies that wars are marked by a series of blunders, misjudgments, or strategic miscalculations, highlighting the human fallibility and flawed decision-making that often accompany armed conflicts.
This quote reframes the idea of having enemies as a positive indication of personal courage, conviction, and standing up for one's beliefs. It suggests that encountering opposition or enemies is an inevitable consequence of taking a stance or fighting for something meaningful. It implies that facing resistance or criticism can be a testament to one's integrity, strength, and willingness to defend what is right. It underscores the idea of embracing challenges and opposition as a sign of personal growth and purpose.
This quote expresses a preference for simplicity and tradition in language, suggesting that short and old words are most effective in communication. It implies that clear and timeless language is superior to complex or novel expressions.
This quote suggests that individuals who possess exceptional talents or achieve greatness in certain areas may not necessarily embody goodness or moral virtue. It points out the distinction between greatness in a specific domain and being a morally upright person.